California city adopts policy banning LGBTQ+ and other flags on city-owned lightpoles

The Torrance City Council this week formally adopted a resolution that effectively bars Pride rainbow flags and other displays of conflicting religious, racial or political beliefs from flying on municipal street light poles, unless they are part of a city-sponsored event.

The resolution, which passed unanimously, stipulates that only banners of city-sponsored events, as well as government and military flags, are allowed on light poles in Torrance’s public right-of-way.

The decision drew the ire of some Torrance community members.

“I find it embarrassing to be a part of a city that doesn’t want anything to do with Pride in any way at all, not even to allow other businesses or districts or areas to utilize the polls for inclusivity and equality,” Tiffany Mitchell, owner of Black Raven Tattoo in Old Torrance, said on Thursday, Aug. 24.

Mitchell is a part of a group made up of Torrance business owners and residents who wrote their own Pride Month Proclamation earlier this year after the city declined to issue one.

Former Torrance Mayor Pat Furey, who had supported Pride proclamations when he was in office, called the resolution “unintended consequences by the group that was very, very adamant about the LGBT+ signage.”

“It’s so very difficult to allow one group to put signage up and then not to allow someone else,” he said Thursday. “I certainly understand the legal reasons for it, but it’s unfortunate.”

The City Council’s move stems from months-long community protest after government workers removed LGBTQ Pride banners from downtown light poles in June. The Downtown Torrance Business Owners’ Association initially put those banners up.

The incident led to confusion and questions from community members about which items can decorate city-owned light poles. Torrance officials, for their part, have said any decorations on public property require city approval.

Emotions ran high during a June 20 City Council meeting. While some people said anything other than government flags could be divisive, others accused the city of selectively enforcing a largely unknown and unobserved regulation.

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE NEWS

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Web Times is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – webtimes.uk. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a Comment